Template:Cargogreg: Difference between revisions

From Nova Sector 13
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
|<div style="border: .2em solid #b08310; border-radius: .5em; background: #ffd000;">
|<div style="border: .2em solid #b08310; border-radius: .5em; background: #ffd000;">
<div style="padding: .5em; background: #bfad7e; margin:.25em; border-radius: .5em; font-weight: bold; font-size: 90%;">
<div style="padding: .5em; background: #bfad7e; margin:.25em; border-radius: .5em; font-weight: bold; font-size: 90%;">
'''Orders:''' Orders, legal or illegal are an IC issue, unless breaking another rule. (see: cargo setting up their own SM.)
*The Cargo/Supply department are not formal employees of NT, they are temporary-contractors from the FTU, filling in for the Cargo Department.
*The Cargo/Supply department are not formal employees of NT, they are temporary-contractors from the FTU, filling in for the Cargo Department.
*As cargo, you shouldn't be refusing orders without a justifying IC reason.
*As cargo, you shouldn't be refusing orders without a justifying IC reason.
*Cargo is still under Corporate Regulations while on NT Property.
*Cargo is still under Corporate Regulations while on NT Property.
'''Orders:''' Orders, legal or illegal are an IC issue, unless breaking another rule. (see: cargo setting up their own SM.)
</div></div>
</div></div>

Revision as of 23:51, 29 January 2025


Cargo Policy

Orders: Orders, legal or illegal are an IC issue, unless breaking another rule. (see: cargo setting up their own SM.)

  • The Cargo/Supply department are not formal employees of NT, they are temporary-contractors from the FTU, filling in for the Cargo Department.
  • As cargo, you shouldn't be refusing orders without a justifying IC reason.
  • Cargo is still under Corporate Regulations while on NT Property.