Corporate Regulations - Revision history

Onionchips at 11:35, 29 March 2026

2026-03-29T11:35:32Z

@@ Line 1,193: / Line 1,193: @@
 |}
 =Procedures=
 {| class="wikitable"
 |+

VonCarstein: /* Use of Force */

2026-03-20T00:37:20Z

Use of Force

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:37, 20 March 2026
Line 1,316:		Line 1,316:
	Personnel should be apprehended using non-lethal means whenever possible. Failure to adhere to this standard may result in disciplinary action, including demotion or job bans.		Personnel should be apprehended using non-lethal means whenever possible. Failure to adhere to this standard may result in disciplinary action, including demotion or job bans.
	{\| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center; width: 75%; background-color:{{c2xx}};"		{\| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center; width: 75%; background-color:{{c2xx}};"
	! colspan="1" style="font-weight: bold; text-align: center; background-color:{{c2xx}};" \| Petty Criminals		! colspan="1" style="font-weight: bold; text-align: center; background-color:{{c2xx}};" \| Petty Criminals / Surrendered Enemies / Incapacitated Enemies
	\|- style="background-color:{{c2xx}};		\|- style="background-color:{{c2xx}};
	\| style="width:100%;" \| Should lethal force be levied against a target that is not set to DNR, or is not set to Execute/Kill on Sight via lawful order from the Captain, Head of Security or Nanotrasen Representative, they must be revived and sentenced/deconverted as soon as possible. Petty criminals, surrendered combatants or detained individuals met with lethal force without proper justification will result in administrative action.		\| style="width:100%;" \| Should lethal force be levied against a target that is not set to DNR, or is not set to Execute/Kill on Sight via lawful order from the Captain, Head of Security or Nanotrasen Representative, they must be revived and sentenced/deconverted as soon as possible. Petty criminals, surrendered combatants or detained individuals met with lethal force without proper justification will result in administrative action.

VonCarstein: /* Use of Force */ Actually if you execute people on the ground, I'm going to job-ban you too

2026-03-20T00:35:55Z

Use of Force: Actually if you execute people on the ground, I'm going to job-ban you too

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:35, 20 March 2026
Line 1,318:		Line 1,318:
	! colspan="1" style="font-weight: bold; text-align: center; background-color:{{c2xx}};" \| Petty Criminals		! colspan="1" style="font-weight: bold; text-align: center; background-color:{{c2xx}};" \| Petty Criminals
	\|- style="background-color:{{c2xx}};		\|- style="background-color:{{c2xx}};
	\| style="width:100%;" \| Should lethal force be levied against a target that is not set to DNR, or is not set to Execute/Kill on Sight via lawful order from the Captain, Head of Security or Nanotrasen Representative, they must be revived and sentenced/deconverted as soon as possible. Petty criminals met with lethal force without proper justification will result in administrative action.		\| style="width:100%;" \| Should lethal force be levied against a target that is not set to DNR, or is not set to Execute/Kill on Sight via lawful order from the Captain, Head of Security or Nanotrasen Representative, they must be revived and sentenced/deconverted as soon as possible. Petty criminals, surrendered combatants or detained individuals met with lethal force without proper justification will result in administrative action.
	\|-}		\|-}
	{\| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center; width: 75%; background-color:{{c3xx}};"		{\| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center; width: 75%; background-color:{{c3xx}};"

VonCarstein: /* Use of Force */ Use Of Force Clarifications

2026-03-20T00:25:55Z

Use of Force: Use Of Force Clarifications

@@ Line 1,310: / Line 1,310: @@
 = Use of Force =
-As a member of security you have access to strong non-lethal gear for taking down foes and troublemakers alike, but there are times when using them would simply be ineffective and you have to resort to lethals.
+As a member of Security, you are equipped with a range of effective non-lethal tools for handling threats and detaining troublemakers. In most situations, these options are expected to be your primary means of engagement, as they are generally more effective at safely defusing conflicts.
 {| class="wikitable"
-|+
+Lethal force is reserved for circumstances where non-lethal methods would be ineffective or where the situation clearly warrants escalation.
-!The situations when lethal force is allowed can be:
 |-
-|'''Non-Lethal Weapons are ineffective''':
+| '''Revolutionaries'''<br>(Non-Heads)
-Hostile that can not be non-lethally detained.
+| '''Armoury Trespassers'''<br>(Armed or Otherwise)
 |-
-|'''Armed and dangerous''':
+! colspan="7" style="font-weight: bold; text-align: center; background-color:{{c4xx}};" | Lethals Recommended - Posthumous Revival Potentially Required
-If a suspect is in possession of weapons or skills that prove lethal, and there is reasonable suspicion or current proof of use against security and crew. Additionally, some specific non-lethal weaponry deemed capable of incapacitating multiple personnel quickly (Contractor Batons, Dart/Syringe Gun, CQC, etc.). This can also apply to niche and powerful tools that are sourced elsewhere, such as; Xeno-biology extracts, Chemical mixes and other Stimulants.
+|- style="background-color:{{c4xx}};"
-'''Note''': A well-performing officer will only resort to lethal means if all else fails.
+| '''Heavily Armed'''<br>(.357, eSword, etc.)
 |-
-|'''Multiple Hostiles''':
+! colspan="7" style="font-weight: bold; text-align: center; background-color:{{c6xx}} | Lethals Expected - Kill on Sight
-It can be extremely difficult to detain multiple hostiles, and if it comes too, you may use lethals to force them to back off.
+|- style="background-color:{{c6xx}};"
 |}

Onionchips: Placing common sense into written text.

2026-03-19T13:21:12Z

Placing common sense into written text.

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:21, 19 March 2026
Line 487:		Line 487:
	\|'''Unauthorised Combat Implant'''		\|'''Unauthorised Combat Implant'''
	\|Any 'combat implant' without permission from an RD, or alternatively, a weapon's permit.		\|Any 'combat implant' without permission from an RD, or alternatively, a weapon's permit.
	* Reviver, thermal eyes, x-ray eyes, mantis blade, no drop, CNS rebooter/jumpstarter, wall penetrating ears, Qani, Binyat, Razorwire, Flash arm, Shell launcher, etc. fall under this list.		* Reviver, thermal eyes, x-ray eyes, mantis blade, no drop, CNS rebooter/jumpstarter, wall penetrating ears, Qani, Binyat, Razorwire, Flash arm, Shell launcher, Strong-arm Implant, etc. fall under this list.
	\|-		\|-
	\|<b>Jaws of Life / Prybar / F.O.C.K (Full override control kit)</b>		\|<b>Jaws of Life / Prybar / F.O.C.K (Full override control kit)</b>

Onionchips at 00:11, 5 February 2026

2026-02-05T00:11:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:11, 5 February 2026
Line 228:		Line 228:
	\| style="background:{{c3xx}};" \|Impersonation of Authority[[#317\| ↩]]		\| style="background:{{c3xx}};" \|Impersonation of Authority[[#317\| ↩]]
	\| style="background:{{c4xx}};" \|		\| style="background:{{c4xx}};" \|
	\| style="background:{{c5xx}};" \|		\| style="background:{{c5xx}};" \|Impersonation of Central Command[[#517\| ↩]]
	\| style="background:{{c6xx}};" \|Impersonation of Central Command[[#617\| ↩]]		\| style="background:{{c6xx}};" \|Impersonation of Central Command High Rank[[#617\| ↩]]
	\| style="background:{{c7xx}};" \|		\| style="background:{{c7xx}};" \|
	\|-		\|-
Line 1,060:		Line 1,060:
	\|''This charge applies to individuals refusing a service that causes harm to the station or individuals. Examples include Cargo withholding lifesaving medicine, Engineering refusing to power the whole station at large, etc.''		\|''This charge applies to individuals refusing a service that causes harm to the station or individuals. Examples include Cargo withholding lifesaving medicine, Engineering refusing to power the whole station at large, etc.''
	\|'''OOC Notes:''' Keep in mind the context of the situation, don't charge this if a department is swamped and is slow because of it.		\|'''OOC Notes:''' Keep in mind the context of the situation, don't charge this if a department is swamped and is slow because of it.
			\|-
			\|517{{anchor\|517}}
			\|'''Impersonation of Central Command'''
			* To impersonate a member of Central Command's staff.
			\|''This is specifically making a conscious effort to impersonate Central Command's staff. This includes wearing clothing, equipment, forged documents, or having IDs that would identify you as a member of Central Command's personnel.''
			\|'''OOC Notes:''' This charge is only applied when someone is trying to pass themselves off as a legitimate member of Central Command. A cardboard ID with Central Command written on it would not be considered a legitimate effort.
			\|-
	\|}		\|}
	----		----
Line 1,132:		Line 1,139:
	\|-		\|-
	\|617{{anchor\|617}}		\|617{{anchor\|617}}
	\|'''Impersonation of Central Command'''		\|'''Impersonation of Central Command High Rank'''
	* To impersonate a member of Central Command.		* To impersonate a member of Central Command's high ranking staff.
	\|''This is specifically making a conscious effort to impersonate Central Command. This includes wearing clothing, equipment, forged documents, or having IDs that would identify you as a member of Central Command.''		\|''This is specifically making a conscious effort to impersonate Central Command's high ranking personnel. This includes wearing clothing, equipment, forged documents, or having IDs that would identify you as a member of Central Command's high rankers. Specifically; Sergeants, Lieutenants, Admirals, Fleet Admirals, or other specialty ranks.''
	\|'''OOC Notes:''' This charge is only applied when someone is trying to pass themselves off as a legitimate member of Central Command. A cardboard ID with Central Command written on it would not be considered a legitimate effort.		\|'''OOC Notes:''' This charge is only applied when someone is trying to pass themselves off as a legitimate member of Central Command. A cardboard ID with Central Command written on it would not be considered a legitimate effort.
	\|}		\|}

Onionchips at 19:45, 12 January 2026

2026-01-12T19:45:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:45, 12 January 2026
Line 893:		Line 893:
	\|'''Failure to Pay a Fine'''		\|'''Failure to Pay a Fine'''
	* Failure to pay Corporate Regulation issued fines.		* Failure to pay Corporate Regulation issued fines.
	\|''Crew have 15 minutes when issued a fine to pay it before this charge can be applied. This ~~time may~~ be extended by the ~~issuing Officer or HoS~~.''		\|''Crew have 15 minutes when issued a fine to pay it before this charge can be applied. This sentence is to be extended by 5 minutes for each crime that enticed the initial fine(s), up to a total of 25 minutes.''
	\|'''OOC Notes:''' Consider lenience if the station is in a state of emergency or chaos, or other extenuating circumstances arise.		\|'''OOC Notes:''' Consider lenience if the station is in a state of emergency or chaos, or other extenuating circumstances arise.
	\|-		\|-

GreytideSkye: typo, and crosslinks

2025-12-16T10:38:14Z

typo, and crosslinks

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:38, 16 December 2025
Line 56:		Line 56:
	* Furthermore, you cannot charge someone with two counts of assault. So, you cannot do two 2'''01''''s.		* Furthermore, you cannot charge someone with two counts of assault. So, you cannot do two 2'''01''''s.
	* You can only charge people with three or less crimes from the '''1xx''' or '''2xx''' categories at a single time.		* You can only charge people with three or less crimes from the '''1xx''' or '''2xx''' categories at a single time.
	* Murder and distribution/possession of contraband charges are stackable and the only exceptions currently. The only exception to possession charges is drug possession.		* [[#Murder\|Murder]] and distribution/possession of contraband charges are stackable and the only exceptions currently. The only exception to possession charges is drug possession.

	=== <div style="text-align: center;">Pardons and Parole</div> ===		=== <div style="text-align: center;">Pardons and Parole</div> ===
Line 944:		Line 944:
	\|'''OOC Notes:''' Intent is extremely important here; and the circumstances behind it. Don't punish people for the incompetence of command staff or saving the station.		\|'''OOC Notes:''' Intent is extremely important here; and the circumstances behind it. Don't punish people for the incompetence of command staff or saving the station.
	\|-		\|-
	\|408{{anchor\|408}}		\|408{{anchor\|408}}{{anchor\|Manslaughter}}
	\|'''Manslaughter'''		\|'''Manslaughter'''
	* To cause death to a person via deliberate attack or excessive negligence, without any intent to kill.		* To cause death to a person via deliberate attack or excessive negligence, without any intent to kill.
	\|''Any effort to prevent the revival of the victim raises this to Murder. If any evidence of intent exists, see Murder.''		\|''Any effort to prevent the revival of the victim raises this to [[#Murder\|Murder]]. If any evidence of intent exists, see Murder.''
	\|'''OOC Notes:''' Use this to punish accidental, or elsewise, unintentional killings, for example: a short fight where someone dies after being hit with rubber-bullets without intent for them to actually be killed. '''IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE:''' There should be some reason, or elsewise, a believable story to justify it being 'unintentional,' or elsewise, rendered aid post-crit/death without any other evidence of 'intent to kill.' (see: Epi-penning them, etc).		\|'''OOC Notes:''' Use this to punish accidental, or elsewise, unintentional killings, for example: a short fight where someone dies after being hit with rubber-bullets without intent for them to actually be killed. '''IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE:''' There should be some reason, or elsewise, a believable story to justify it being 'unintentional,' or elsewise, rendered aid post-crit/death without any other evidence of 'intent to kill.' (see: Epi-penning them, etc).
	\|-		\|-
Line 995:		Line 995:
	!		!
	\|-		\|-
	\|501{{anchor\|501}}		\|501{{anchor\|501}}{{anchor\|GBH}}
	\|'''Assault (Grevious Bodily Harm)'''		\|'''Assault (Grevious Bodily Harm)'''
	* To use excessive physical force resulting in severe or life-threatening harm.		* To use excessive physical force resulting in severe or life-threatening harm.
Line 1,023:		Line 1,023:
	* For any person, crewmember, or elsewise, who has shown rampant disregard for ones self, to an outright destructive degree.		* For any person, crewmember, or elsewise, who has shown rampant disregard for ones self, to an outright destructive degree.
	\|''Constantly endangering yourself, command or non-combat crew throwing themselves into hostage situations and trying to escalate it, engineers killing themselves multiple times trying to hack the same machine without insuls, and comparable forms of recklessly endangering yourself. If an incident is severe enough, this may be charged based on a single instance of activity. A Psychiatrist or the CMO must be called to give an evaluation after the charge is codified if available.''		\|''Constantly endangering yourself, command or non-combat crew throwing themselves into hostage situations and trying to escalate it, engineers killing themselves multiple times trying to hack the same machine without insuls, and comparable forms of recklessly endangering yourself. If an incident is severe enough, this may be charged based on a single instance of activity. A Psychiatrist or the CMO must be called to give an evaluation after the charge is codified if available.''
	\|'''OOC Notes:''' This should be used in good faith; if someone ~~accidently~~ knocks a vending machine on themselves, you shouldn't be trying to push this.		\|'''OOC Notes:''' This should be used in good faith; if someone accidentally knocks a vending machine on themselves, you shouldn't be trying to push this.
	\|-		\|-
	\|510{{anchor\|510}}		\|510{{anchor\|510}}
Line 1,071:		Line 1,071:
	!		!
	\|-		\|-
	\|601{{anchor\|601}}		\|601{{anchor\|601}}{{anchor\|Murder}}
	\|'''Murder'''		\|'''Murder'''
	* (Unjustified) To use excessive physical force with intention to cause death in a situation that doesn't warrant it (self-defense doesn't apply.)		* (Unjustified) To use excessive physical force with intention to cause death in a situation that doesn't warrant it (self-defense doesn't apply.)
	\|''If aid was rendered to the victim by the perpetrator afterwards, this may actually be Manslaughter. For attempted murder, use Assault GBH (~~401~~). Murder charges can be stacked.''		\|''If aid was rendered to the victim by the perpetrator afterwards, this may actually be [[#Manslaughter\|Manslaughter]]. For attempted murder, use [[#GBH\|Assault GBH (501)]]. Murder charges can be stacked.''
	\|'''OOC Notes:''' This only counts as murder if the victim died due to a direct result of their actions; with no attempt made to aid them during their final moments. Intent is extremely important here, it can be the difference between manslaughter and murder. Unfortunately, unlike Dungeons & Dragons, you can't shoot someone in the face with buckshot non-lethally, and else-wise, it's meant to be a slightly-grey area to allow people some lee-way with 'going a bit far.'		\|'''OOC Notes:''' This only counts as murder if the victim died due to a direct result of their actions; with no attempt made to aid them during their final moments. Intent is extremely important here, it can be the difference between manslaughter and murder. Unfortunately, unlike Dungeons & Dragons, you can't shoot someone in the face with buckshot non-lethally, and else-wise, it's meant to be a slightly-grey area to allow people some lee-way with 'going a bit far.'
	\|-		\|-
Line 1,080:		Line 1,080:
	\|'''Terrorism'''		\|'''Terrorism'''
	* To create mass-destruction and/or terror for a political, racial, ideological or religious cause.		* To create mass-destruction and/or terror for a political, racial, ideological or religious cause.
	\|''This is specifically and only for what it is defined for. This is for '''terrorism''', which under its definition, requires political, racial, ideological or religious motivation. Without it, it's something else. You may charge multiple cases of murder as multiple cases of murder, not terrorism.''		\|''This is specifically and only for what it is defined for. This is for '''terrorism''', which under its definition, requires political, racial, ideological or religious motivation. Without it, it's something else. You may charge multiple cases of [[#Murder\|murder]] as multiple cases of murder, not terrorism.''
	\|'''OOC Notes:''' None.		\|'''OOC Notes:''' None.
	\|-		\|-

Onionchips at 15:43, 14 December 2025

2025-12-14T15:43:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:43, 14 December 2025
Line 1,350:		Line 1,350:
	* Suspicious activity, violent crimes, strong suspicion of developing threats to the station.		* Suspicious activity, violent crimes, strong suspicion of developing threats to the station.
	\|		\|
	* The ~~security mech (~~Paddy) may ~~now~~ be ~~used freely~~.		* The Paddy may be deployed from the security mech-bay.
			* Non/Less Lethals are still preferred but officers are permitted to keep lethal means at the ready.
	\|		\|
	*Security may field search ~~people without~~ a ~~search~~ warrant. ~~They may bring them to the brig provided that there~~ is ~~approval~~ from ~~their department head~~.		* Security may conduct a field search only if there is '''probable cause/reason''' to do so, and must still abide by privacy laws unless presenting a warrant.

			* Vigilance is expected from every security member onboard, and they must patrol in frequent intervals.
	\|-		\|-
	\|		\|

Onionchips: Briefly expanded on what "probable cause" for implant searches is, clearing the vagueness.

2025-12-09T21:49:08Z

Briefly expanded on what "probable cause" for implant searches is, clearing the vagueness.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:49, 9 December 2025
Line 1,291:		Line 1,291:
	\|		\|
	=== Implant Searches ===		=== Implant Searches ===
	Security ~~can perform~~ implant ~~searches with probable~~ cause.		Security are permitted to implant search personnel that are under suspicion or have been confirmed to be in possession of at least one.

			Probable cause for a search would be; visual confirmation, visual clues, witness reports and similar, concrete evidence (Items being suspiciously stuck to hands, getting up unusually quickly from stuns and so on...)

			Crimes that warrant permanent confinement clear security to conduct a '''full body search.'''
	\|-		\|-
	\|		\|